Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrotons de los Reyes, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorVirumbrales Cancio, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorCastellvi, Pere
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Regada, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorBalaguer, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-07T17:28:38Z
dc.date.available2026-05-07T17:28:38Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-15
dc.identifier.citationBrotons de los Reyes, Pedro; Virumbrales Cancio, Montserrat; Castellvi, Pere[et al.]. Assessment of empathy by simulated patients: Adaptation and validation of a new instrument. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 2026, 43(4):Doc50. Disponibles en <https://journals.publisso.de/en/journals/jme/volume43/zma001844>. Fecha de acceso: 7 may. 2026. DOI: 10.3205/zma001844ca
dc.identifier.issn2366-5017ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/5315
dc.descriptionThis study was partially funded by a competitive grant for medical education research projects awarded by the Sociedad Española de Educación Médica (SEDEM).ca
dc.description.abstractBackground: Medical doctors’ empathy is vital in their interaction with patients, impacting on patient trust and health outcomes. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale helps assess healthcare professionals’ empathy but there is a reasonable doubt about its validity when directly implemented in simulation contexts. This study adapts and validates a version of the CARE scale for simulated patients (Sp-SIMCARE), filling a gap in empathy assessment within medical training simulations. Methods: The contextual adaptation of the CARE scale for simulated patients followed a four-phase process: 1) preparation of a preliminary adaptation proposal; 2) drafting the first version; 3) piloting the initial version with simulated patients; and 4) refining the final Sp-SIMCARE version. A panel of five experts collaborated with five simulated patients to ensure clarity, relevance, and language equivalence. The validation was conducted using typical primary care scenarios. Simulated patients assessed the performance of undergraduate medical students in four primary patient roles: acute, chronic, with high functional component, and with a hostile attitude. Psychometric parameters that were evaluated included convergent validity (assessed by simulated patients using a global score), acceptability and face validity, homogeneity, and internal reliability. Results: The adaptation process resulted in a clear, relevant, and comprehensible scale, ensuring uniform understanding among users. Validation involved 95 students in 270 encounters with eight simulated patients. The final version showed convergent validity (Spearman’s rho=0.730, p<0.001), acceptability and face validity (1.96% “Does not apply”/missing values), homogeneity (item-total correlations 0.705-0.865) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha=0.960). Conclusions: The Sp-SIMCARE scale appears to be a valid and reliable tool for simulated patients to assess empathy in future doctors during their training from a multidimensional perspective.ca
dc.format.extent20ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherGMS Journal for Medical Educationca
dc.relation.ispartofseries43;4
dc.rights©2026 Brotons de los Reyes et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherEmpathyca
dc.subject.otherMedical educationca
dc.subject.otherMedical studentca
dc.subject.otherPatient simulationca
dc.subject.otherValidation studyca
dc.subject.otherPsychometricsca
dc.subject.otherEmpatíaca
dc.subject.otherFormación médicaca
dc.subject.otherEstudiante de medicinaca
dc.subject.otherSimulación de pacientesca
dc.subject.otherEstudio de validaciónca
dc.subject.otherPsicometríaca
dc.subject.otherEmpatiaca
dc.subject.otherFormació mèdicaca
dc.subject.otherEstudiant de medicinaca
dc.subject.otherSimulació de pacientsca
dc.subject.otherEstudi de validacióca
dc.subject.otherPsicometriaca
dc.titleAssessment of empathy by simulated patients: Adaptation and validation of a new instrumentca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001844ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©2026 Brotons de los Reyes et al. This is an Open Access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License. See license information at
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint