Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacpherson, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRoqué Sánchez, María Victoria
dc.contributor.authorEcharte, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSegarra, Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-23T12:59:51Z
dc.date.available2024-12-23T12:59:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationMacpherson, Ignacio; Roqué Sánchez, María Victoria; Echarte, Luis [et al.]. Ethical challenges during critical phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: An interpretive synthesis. Nursing Ethics, 2024, 31(8), p. 1646-1660. Disponible en: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09697330241230684>. Fecha de acceso: 23 dic. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/09697330241230684ca
dc.identifier.issn0969-7330ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4503
dc.description.abstractBackground: During the most critical phases of COVID-19 pandemic, dramatic situations were experienced in hospitals and care centers that nurses could hardly verbalize. Especially relevant were deep challenges related to terminal illness, situations of extreme sacrifice, as well as reflections on protective measures mixed with beliefs. We intend to analyze which problems had the greatest impact on professionals. Aim: The aim is to explore the ultimate basis for action when making decisions and the orientation of their behavior in the face of moral conflicts. Method: The methodological strategy is an interpretive synthesis. Narrative review of academic articles that analyzed ethical dilemmas during the pandemic was carried out by searching five databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Psycinfo, CINHAL, and WOS) between January 2020 and December 2022. Finally, 43 articles were selected. Ethical Considerations: Ethical requirements were respected in all study phases. Results: The reading and review of the 43 articles initiated the first phase of inductive coding which resulted in 14 initial sub-themes. Based on this structure, a second phase of coding was carried out, giving rise to six categories or emerging themes. To facilitate the process of identifying the central category, the authors agreed to carry out a phase of synthesis, grouping the six themes into three meta-themes: the identification and acceptance of human vulnerability; the discovery of positive paradigms in traumatic situations in society; the prevalence of the common good over the particular interest, as the core structure of any society. Conclusion: The study has shown the need to consider healthcare benevolence as a new dimension of health care upon global vulnerability. Responsibility is required to ensure the well-being of a global society, prioritizing the common good over particular interests and building solutions on solid moral structures. A new ethical landscape is essential, starting with a humanistic curricular training of all healthcare professionals.ca
dc.format.extent14ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSage Journalsca
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Ethicsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries31;8
dc.rights© 2024 by SAGE Publicationsca
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19ca
dc.titleEthical challenges during critical phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interpretive synthesisca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230684ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint