Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFlores-Yélamos, Míriam
dc.contributor.authorGomila, Aina
dc.contributor.authorBadia, Josep M
dc.contributor.authorAlmendral, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Fariñas, Ana
dc.contributor.authorParés MD, PhD, EBSQ-Coloproctology, FACS, David
dc.contributor.authorPASCUAL, MARTA
dc.contributor.authorLimón, Enric
dc.contributor.authorPujol, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorJuvany, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorMembers of the VINCat Colorectal Surveillance Team
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T09:19:25Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T09:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationFlores-Yelamos, Miriam; Gomila-Grange, Aina; Badia, Josep M. [et al.]. Comparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort study. BJS Open, 2024, 8(4), zrae080. Disponible en: <https://academic.oup.com/bjsopen/article/8/4/zrae080/7728177?login=false>. Fecha de acceso: 10 oct. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae080ca
dc.identifier.issn2474-9842ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4417
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is controversy regarding the maximum number of elements that can be included in a surgical site infection prevention bundle. In addition, it is unclear whether a bundle of this type can be implemented at a multicentre level. Methods: A pragmatic, multicentre cohort study was designed to analyse surgical site infection rates in elective colorectal surgery after the sequential implementation of two preventive bundle protocols. Secondary outcomes were to determine compliance with individual measures and to establish their effectiveness, duration of stay, microbiology and 30-day mortality rate. Results: A total of 32 205 patients were included. A 50% reduction in surgical site infection was achieved after the implementation of two sequential sets of bundles: from 18.16% in the Baseline group to 10.03% with Bundle-1 and 8.19% with Bundle-2. Bundle-2 reduced superficial-surgical site infection (OR 0.74 (95% c.i. 0.58 to 0.95); P = 0.018) and deep-surgical site infection (OR 0.66 (95% c.i. 0.46 to 0.93); P = 0.018) but not organ/space-surgical site infection (OR 0.88 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 1.06); P = 0.172). Compliance increased after the addition of four measures to Bundle-2. In the multivariable analysis, for organ/space-surgical site infection, laparoscopy, oral antibiotic prophylaxis and mechanical bowel preparation were protective factors in colonic procedures, while no protective factors were found in rectal surgery. Duration of stay fell significantly over time, from 7 in the Baseline group to 6 and 5 days for Bundle-1 and Bundle-2 respectively (P < 0.001). The mortality rate fell from 1.4% in the Baseline group to 0.59% and 0.6% for Bundle-1 and Bundle-2 respectively (P < 0.001). There was an increase in Gram-positive bacteria and yeast isolation, and reduction in Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes in organ/space-surgical site infection. Conclusions: The addition of measures to create a final 10-measure protocol had a cumulative protective effect on reducing surgical site infection. However, organ/space-surgical site infection did not benefit from the addition. No protective measures were found for organ/space-surgical site infection in rectal surgery. Compliance with preventive measures increased from Bundle-1 to Bundle-2.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherOxford University Pressca
dc.relation.ispartofBJS Openca
dc.relation.ispartofseries8;4
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherProfilaxi antibiòticaca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia colorectalca
dc.subject.otherLaparoscòpiaca
dc.subject.otherProcediments quirúrgicsca
dc.subject.otherOperatiusca
dc.subject.otherInfecció de la ferida quirúrgicaca
dc.subject.otherInfeccionsca
dc.subject.otherMortalitatca
dc.subject.otherFactors de proteccióca
dc.subject.otherPrevencióca
dc.subject.otherProfilaxis antibióticaca
dc.subject.otherCirugía colorrectalca
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopiaca
dc.subject.otherProcedimientos quirúrgicosca
dc.subject.otherQuirúrgicosca
dc.subject.otherInfección de herida quirúrgicaca
dc.subject.otherInfeccionesca
dc.subject.otherMortalidadca
dc.subject.otherFactores de protecciónca
dc.subject.otherPrevenciónca
dc.subject.otherAntibiotic prophylaxisca
dc.subject.otherColorectal surgeryca
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopyca
dc.subject.otherSurgical proceduresca
dc.subject.otherOperativeca
dc.subject.otherSurgical wound infectionca
dc.subject.otherInfectionsca
dc.subject.otherMortalityca
dc.subject.otherProtective factorsca
dc.subject.otherPreventionca
dc.titleComparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort studyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae080ca


Ficheros en el ítem

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir