Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlanco, David
dc.contributor.authorBiggane, Alice M.
dc.contributor.authorCobo, Erik
dc.contributor.authorMiRoR network
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T17:08:19Z
dc.date.available2022-06-03T17:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBlanco, David; Biggane, Alice M.; Cobo, Erik [et al.]. Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers? Trials, 2018, 19, 80. Disponible en: <https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0>. Fecha de acceso: 3 jun. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0ca
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3329
dc.description.abstractBackground: Compulsory submission of a checklist from the relevant reporting guideline is one of the most widespread journal requirements aiming to improve completeness of reporting. However, the current suboptimal levels of adherence to reporting guidelines observed in the literature may indicate that this journal policy is not having a significant effect. Findings: We explored whether authors provided the appropriate CONSORT checklist extension for their study and whether there were inconsistencies between what authors claimed on the submitted checklist and what was actually reported in the published paper. We randomly selected 12 randomized trials from three journals that provide the originally submitted checklist and analyzed six core CONSORT items. Only one paper used the appropriate checklist extension and had no inconsistencies between what was claimed in the submitted checklist and what was reported in the published paper. Conclusion: Journals should take further actions to take full advantage of the requirement for the submission of fulfilled CONSORT checklists, thus ensuring that these checklists reflect what is reported in the manuscript.en
dc.format.extent4ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringer Natureca
dc.relation.ispartofTrialsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries19
dc.relation.urihttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0ca
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherDirectrius per a la presentació d'informesca
dc.subject.otherExhaustivitat dels informesca
dc.subject.otherInforme d'incoherènciesca
dc.subject.otherCONSORTca
dc.subject.otherAvalca
dc.subject.otherDirectrices de informeses
dc.subject.otherIntegridad de los informeses
dc.subject.otherInformes de inconsistenciases
dc.subject.otherCONSORTes
dc.subject.otherAprobaciónes
dc.subject.otherReporting guidelinesen
dc.subject.otherCompleteness of reportingen
dc.subject.otherReporting inconsistenciesen
dc.subject.otherCONSORTen
dc.subject.otherEndorsementen
dc.titleAre CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/676207
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/