Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanegas Argota, Sebastián Anselmo
dc.contributor.authorAntón López, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorMorilla Grasa, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBogado, Marco
dc.contributor.authorAyala-Fuentes, Miriam Eleonora
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Guardiola, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Montañes, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T17:14:20Z
dc.date.available2021-11-17T17:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBanegas, Sebastián A.; Antón López, Alfonso; Morilla-Grasa, Antonio [et al.]. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer Tthickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index in progressive glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma, 2016 Mar, 25(3), e229-35. Disponible en: <https://journals.lww.com/glaucomajournal/Abstract/2016/03000/Evaluation_of_the_Retinal_Nerve_Fiber_Layer.34.aspx>. Fecha de acceso: 17 nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280ca
dc.identifier.issn1057-0829ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2958
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. METHODS: The authors studied 246 eyes of 148 patients prospectively (97 glaucoma cases, 132 suspects, and 17 healthy eyes). SAP fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and optic disc stereophotographs were obtained every 6 to 12 months. Progression was determined in SAP and in OCT with a Glaucoma Progression Analysis software, and also by masked assessment of the stereophotograph series. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences between methods in RNFL thickness, visual field (VF) mean deviation, and VFI. The relationship between the baseline classification and the detection of glaucomatous progression by the different tests was assessed by the χ statistic. RESULTS: Ninety-nine eyes (40.2%) presented glaucomatous progression detected by at least 1 examination method. Progressing eyes detected only by OCT had a higher mean RNFL thickness and mean VFI than progressing eyes detected only by VF or stereophotographs (P<0.003). Most progressive cases detected by OCT (68%) were initially classified at baseline as suspects, whereas most eyes with VF progression (61%) were initially classified as glaucoma. The initial classification was significantly related to the presence of progression by different tests [χ (2)=9.643 for VF event analysis and 7.290 for OCT event analysis (P<0.005)]./nCONCLUSIONS: Different tests are more likely to detect the progression in different clinical circumstances or stages of glaucoma; these should be taken into consideration when performing the difficult task of progression detection.en
dc.format.extent19ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Healthca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Glaucomaca
dc.relation.ispartofseries25;3
dc.rightsRights: this is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Banegas SA1, Antón A, Morilla A, Bogado M, Ayala EM, Fernandez-Guardiola A. et al. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index in progressive glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016 Mar;25(3):e229-35. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280.en
dc.subject.otherFibra nerviosa de la retinaca
dc.subject.otherDesviació mitjanaca
dc.subject.otherÍndex de camp visualca
dc.subject.otherGlaucoma progressiuca
dc.subject.otherFibra nerviosa de la retinaes
dc.subject.otherDesviación mediaes
dc.subject.otherÍndice de campo visuales
dc.subject.otherGlaucoma progresivoes
dc.subject.otherNerve fiber of the retinaen
dc.subject.otherMean deviationen
dc.subject.otherVisual field indexen
dc.subject.otherProgressive glaucomaen
dc.titleEvaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer Thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index in progressive glaucomaen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.subject.udc617ca
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record