Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonzález Rueda, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo-García, César
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
dc.contributor.authorBueno-Gracia, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPérez Bellmunt, Albert
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Rubio, Pere Ramón
dc.contributor.authorLópez-de-Celis, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T10:00:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T10:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Rueda, Vanessa; Hidalgo-García, César; Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo [et al.]. Does upper cervical manual therapy provide additional benefit in disability and mobility over a physiotherapy primary care program for chronic cervicalgia? A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(22), p. 1-14. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8334>. Fecha de acceso: 27 nov. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228334.ca
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1806
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Neck pain is a condition with a high incidence in primary care. Patients with chronic neck pain often experience reduction in neck mobility. However, no study to date has investigated the effects of manual mobilization of the upper cervical spine in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding an upper cervical translatoric mobilization or an inhibitory suboccipital technique to a conventional physical therapy protocol in patients with chronic neck pain test on disability and cervical range of motion. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with chronic neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation were randomized in three groups: Upper cervical translatoric mobilization group, inhibitory suboccipital technique group, or control group. The neck disability index, active cervical mobility, and the flexion–rotation test were assessed at baseline (T0), after the treatment (T1), and at three-month follow-up (T2). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in neck disability index. The upper cervical translatoric mobilization group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the more restricted side at T1 (F = 5.992; p < 0.004) and T2 (F = 5.212; p < 0.007) compared to the control group. The inhibitory suboccipital technique group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the less restricted side at T1 (F = 3.590; p < 0.027). All groups presented high percentages of negative flexion–rotation tests. (T1: 69.2% upper neck translator mobilization group; 38.5% suboccipital inhibition technique group, 19.2% control group; at T2: 80.8%; 46.2% and 26.9% respectively). No significant differences in the active cervical mobility were found between groups. Conclusion: Adding manual therapy to a conventional physical therapy protocol for the upper cervical spine increased the flexion–rotation test in the short- and mid-term in patients with chronic neck pain. No changes were found in the neck disability index and the global active cervical range of motion.ca
dc.format.extent14ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthca
dc.relation.ispartofseries17:22
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).ca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherCollca
dc.subject.otherCervicàlgiaca
dc.subject.otherFisioteràpiaca
dc.subject.otherColumna vertebralca
dc.subject.otherDiscapacitat físicaca
dc.subject.otherAtenció primàriaca
dc.subject.otherCuelloca
dc.subject.otherCervicalgiaca
dc.subject.otherFisioterapiaca
dc.subject.otherColumna vertebralca
dc.subject.otherDiscapacidadesca
dc.subject.otherAtención primariaca
dc.subject.otherNeckca
dc.subject.otherCervical painca
dc.subject.otherPhysiotherapyca
dc.subject.otherSpineca
dc.subject.otherDisabilitiesca
dc.subject.otherPrimary careca
dc.titleDoes upper cervical manual therapy provide additional benefit in disability and mobility over a physiotherapy primary care program for chronic cervicalgia? A randomized controlled trialca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.subject.udc616.7ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228334ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint