Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanegas Argota, Sebastián Anselmo
dc.contributor.authorAntón López, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorMorilla Grasa, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBogado, Marco
dc.contributor.authorAyala, Eleonora M.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Montañés, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T08:54:01Z
dc.date.available2019-10-02T08:54:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.identifier.citationBanegas, Sebastian A.; Antón López, Alfonso; Morilla Grasa, Antonio; Bogado, Marco; Ayala, Eleonora M.; Moreno Montanes, Javier. «Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry, and stereophotography in the detection of glaucoma progression». Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2015, vol. 56, núm. 2, p. 1253-1260. Disponible en: <https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2212891>. Fecha de acceso: 02 oct. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14994ca
dc.identifier.issn0146-0404ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1244
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereo photography in the detection of glaucomatous progression. METHODS. This was an observational cohort study enrolling 246 eyes (148 patients) followed for an average of 31.8 +/- 9 months. Images were obtained every 6 to 12 months with optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual field test, and optic disc stereo photography. Progression was determined with OCT using guided progression analysis (GPA) software, in perimetry with Humphrey field analyzer GPA, and by masked assessment of stereo photograph series. Agreement among methods was reported using the kappa coefficient, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), overall percentage agreement (OPA), percentage of positive agreement (Ppos), and percentage of negative agreement (Pneg). RESULTS. Progression by stereo photos, SAP, and OCT was found in 17 eyes (6.9%), 37 eyes (15%), and 63 eyes (25.6%), respectively. Most cases with detectable changes were only identified by one examination method, resulting in low Ppos (<33%). On the contrary, 147 eyes (59.7%) were identified as nonprogressing cases by all three methods, showing high OPA (72.8-89.8) and high Pneg (83.8-94.5). PABAK and AC1 between methods reached 0.67 to 0.88. Measurements of agreement showed a trend toward better agreement between photos and visual field (VF) than between photos and OCT. Spectral-domain OCT parameters reflected a tendency toward better agreement with stereo photos than with VF. CONCLUSIONS. Methods obtained acceptable agreement outcomes in terms of PABAK, AC1, and OPA. However, most cases with detectable changes were identified only by one examination method, resulting in low Ppos.ca
dc.format.extent8ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyca
dc.relation.ispartofInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scienceca
dc.relation.ispartofseries56;2
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherGlaucomaca
dc.subject.otherOftalmologiaca
dc.subject.otherOftalmologíaca
dc.subject.otherOphthalmologyca
dc.subject.otherOjos--Enfermedadesca
dc.subject.otherUlls--Malaltiesca
dc.subject.otherEye--Diseasesca
dc.subject.otherTomografíaca
dc.subject.otherTomografiaca
dc.subject.otherTomographyca
dc.titleAgreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry, and stereophotography in the detection of glaucoma progressionca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.subject.udc617ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14994ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/