Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDuran-Sindreu, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Marc
dc.contributor.authorOlivieri, Juan Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorMercadé, Montse
dc.contributor.authorMorelló, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorRoig, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T15:40:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-28T15:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDuran-Sindreu, Fernando; García, Marc; Olivieri, Juan Gonzalo [et al.]. A Comparison of Apical Transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files Rotary Instruments. 2012, 38(7), p. 993-995. Disponible en: <https://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399(12)00333-0/abstract>. Fecha de acceso: 28 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.019ca
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4657
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate apical transportation in root canals after the use of Twisted Files (TF; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) and FlexMaster (VDW, Munich, Germany) #40/04 rotary files. Methods: A double-digital radiographic technique was used to compare apical transportation between the TF and FlexMaster systems. Each rotary system was used to instrument mesial canals from 80 extracted mandibular molars. The central axes of the file imaged before instrumentation (#15 K-file) and the master apical rotary file (#40/04) were superimposed digitally. AutoCAD 2008 (Autodesk Inc, San Rafael, CA) was used to measure apical transportation at 0.5 mm from the working length (WL). The data were analyzed using the Student's t test, and significance was set at P < .05. Results: The mean amount of apical transportation at 0.5 mm from the WL was 0.17 ± 0.09 mm for the FlexMaster group and 0.19 ± 0.12 mm for the TF group. No statistically significant differences in apical transportation were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Under the conditions of the study, no statistically significant differences in apical transportation were observed between FlexMaster and TF rotary files.ca
dc.format.extent2ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries38;7
dc.rights© Elsevierca
dc.subject.otherTransport apicalca
dc.subject.otherFitxers FlexMasterca
dc.subject.otherArxius retorçatsca
dc.subject.otherPreparació del conducte radicularca
dc.subject.otherTransporte apicalca
dc.subject.otherLimas FlexMasterca
dc.subject.otherLimas retorcidasca
dc.subject.otherPreparación del conducto radicularca
dc.subject.otherApical transportationca
dc.subject.otherFlexMaster filesca
dc.subject.otherTwisted filesca
dc.subject.otherRoot canal preparationca
dc.titleA Comparison of Apical Transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files Rotary Instrumentsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/annotationca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.019ca


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir