A Comparison of Apical Transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files Rotary Instruments
Autor/a
Fecha de publicación
2012ISSN
0099-2399
Resumen
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate apical transportation in root canals after the use of Twisted Files (TF; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) and FlexMaster (VDW, Munich, Germany) #40/04 rotary files. Methods: A double-digital radiographic technique was used to compare apical transportation between the TF and FlexMaster systems. Each rotary system was used to instrument mesial canals from 80 extracted mandibular molars. The central axes of the file imaged before instrumentation (#15 K-file) and the master apical rotary file (#40/04) were superimposed digitally. AutoCAD 2008 (Autodesk Inc, San Rafael, CA) was used to measure apical transportation at 0.5 mm from the working length (WL). The data were analyzed using the Student's t test, and significance was set at P < .05. Results: The mean amount of apical transportation at 0.5 mm from the WL was 0.17 ± 0.09 mm for the FlexMaster group and 0.19 ± 0.12 mm for the TF group. No statistically significant differences in apical transportation were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Under the conditions of the study, no statistically significant differences in apical transportation were observed between FlexMaster and TF rotary files.
Tipo de documento
Anotaciones
Versión del documento
Versión publicada
Lengua
Inglés
Materias (CDU)
616.3 - Patología del aparato digestivo. Odontología
Palabras clave
Páginas
2
Publicado por
Elsevier
Colección
38; 7
Publicado en
Journal of Endodontics
Citación recomendada
Duran-Sindreu, Fernando; García, Marc; Olivieri, Juan Gonzalo [et al.]. A Comparison of Apical Transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files Rotary Instruments. 2012, 38(7), p. 993-995. Disponible en: <https://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399(12)00333-0/abstract>. Fecha de acceso: 28 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.019
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
- Odontologia [341]
Derechos
© Elsevier
