Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Nicholas G.
dc.contributor.authorAparicio, Conrado
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T08:11:04Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T08:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.citationFischer, Nicholas G.; Aparicio, Conrado. Junctional epithelium and hemidesmosomes: tape and rivets for solving the “percutaneous device dilemma” in dental and other permanent implants. Bioactive Materials, 2022, 18, p. 178-198. Disponible en: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X22001359>. Fecha de acceso: 19 abr. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.019ca
dc.identifier.issn2452-199Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3666
dc.description.abstractThe percutaneous device dilemma describes etiological factors, centered around the disrupted epithelial tissue surrounding non-remodelable devices, that contribute to rampant percutaneous device infection. Natural percutaneous organs, in particular their extracellular matrix mediating the “device”/epithelium interface, serve as exquisite examples to inspire longer lasting long-term percutaneous device design. For example, the tooth's imperviousness to infection is mediated by the epithelium directly surrounding it, the junctional epithelium (JE). The hallmark feature of JE is formation of hemidesmosomes, cell/matrix adhesive structures that attach surrounding oral gingiva to the tooth's enamel through a basement membrane. Here, the authors survey the multifaceted functions of the JE, emphasizing the role of the matrix, with a particular focus on hemidesmosomes and their five main components. The authors highlight the known (and unknown) effects dental implant – as a model percutaneous device – placement has on JE regeneration and synthesize this information for application to other percutaneous devices. The authors conclude with a summary of bioengineering strategies aimed at solving the percutaneous device dilemma and invigorating greater collaboration between clinicians, bioengineers, and matrix biologists.en
dc.format.extent21ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofBioactive Materialsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries18
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X22001359ca
dc.rightsUnder a Creative Commons license.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.otherDispositiu percutanica
dc.subject.otherImplant percutanica
dc.subject.otherHemidesmosomesca
dc.subject.otherEpiteli de unióca
dc.subject.otherSuperfícies bioinspiradesca
dc.subject.otherDispositivo percutáneoes
dc.subject.otherImplante percutáneoes
dc.subject.otherHemidesmosomases
dc.subject.otherEpitelio de uniónes
dc.subject.otherSuperficies bioinspiradases
dc.subject.otherPercutaneous deviceen
dc.subject.otherPercutaneous implanten
dc.subject.otherHemidesmosomesen
dc.subject.otherJunctional epitheliumen
dc.subject.otherBioinspired surfacesen
dc.titleJunctional epithelium and hemidesmosomes: tape and rivets for solving the “percutaneous device dilemma” in dental and other permanent implantsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.019ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Under a Creative Commons license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint