Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHernandez Alfaro, Federico
dc.contributor.authorGiralt Hernando, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBrabyn, Philip
dc.contributor.authorHaas Junior, Orion Luiz
dc.contributor.authorValls-Ontañón, Adaia
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-10T07:08:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHernández-Alfaro, Federico; Giralt-Hernando, Maria; Brabyn, Philip[et al.]. Variation between natural head orientation and Frankfort horizontal planes in orthognathic surgery patients: 187 consecutive cases. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 50(9), páginas 1226-1232. Disponible en <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502721000527>. Fecha de acceso: 10 jun. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.011ca
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020ca
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/5391
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the Frankfort horizontal (FH) and natural head orientation (NHO), their correlation between patients’ malocclusion, and the impact of counterclockwise rotation (CCW) on the FH-NHO angle variation after orthognathic surgery. An evaluation of 187 consecutive patients was performed at the Maxillofacial Institute (Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona). FH-NHO° was measured pre- and postoperatively at 1 and 12 months, after three-dimensional (3D) superimposition using a software (Dolphin®). Patients were classified as follows: 3.2%, 48.7% and 48.1%, class I, II and III, respectively. Baseline FH-NHO° was significantly positive for patients with dentofacial deformities (2.73° ± 4.19 (2.12–3.33°, P < 0.001). The impact of orthognathic surgery in FH-NHO° was greater in class II when compared with class III patients, with a variation of 2.04° ± 4.79 (P < 0.001) and −1.20° ± 3.03 (P < 0.001), respectively. FH-NHO° increased when CCW rotational movements were performed (P = 0.006). The results of this study suggest that pre- and postoperative NHO differs from FH in orthognathic patients. The angle between FH and NHO is significantly larger in class III than in class II patients at baseline, which converges after orthognathic surgery when CCW rotation is performed. Therefore, NHO should be used as the real horizontal plane when planning for orthognathic surgery.ca
dc.format.extent7ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryca
dc.relation.ispartofseries50;9
dc.rights@ 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.ca
dc.subject.otherPatient positioningca
dc.subject.otherOrthognathic surgeryca
dc.subject.otherDentofacial deformitiesca
dc.subject.otherThree-dimensional imagingca
dc.subject.otherCone-beam computed tomographyca
dc.subject.otherColocación del pacienteca
dc.subject.otherCirugía ortognáticaca
dc.subject.otherDeformidades dentofacialesca
dc.subject.otherImágenes tridimensionalesca
dc.subject.otherTomografía computarizada de haz cónicoca
dc.subject.otherPosicionament del pacientca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia ortognàticaca
dc.subject.otherDeformitats dentofacialsca
dc.subject.otherImatgeria tridimensionalca
dc.subject.otherTomografia computada de feix cònicca
dc.titleVariation between natural head orientation and Frankfort horizontal planes in orthognathic surgery patients: 187 consecutive casesca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.embargo.termsforeverca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.011ca
dc.date.embargoEnd9999-01-01


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint