Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGargallo-Albiol, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorZilleruelo-Pozo, María José
dc.contributor.authorLucas-Taulé, Ernest
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Peñalver, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorPaternostro-Betancourt, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHernandez Alfaro, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T14:27:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-16T14:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGargallo-Albiol, Jordi; Zilleruelo-Pozo, María José; Lucas-Taulé, Ernest [et al.]. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26, p. 2783-2791. Disponible en: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3>. Fecha de acceso: 16 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3ca
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4543
dc.description.abstractObjective: A cohort prospective study was conducted to assess the three-dimensional positioning accuracy of the implant between pre-surgical and the final implant position using a static fully guided approach in the posterior area of the jaws. Materials and methods: A total of 60 implants (30 patients) were digitally analyzed after superimposing the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files obtained from the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) pre- and post-implant placement. The software calculations included deviations at the implant shoulder and at the implant apex, global deviation (3D offset), and angle deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with α = 0.05. Results: Considering the total number of implants, mesiodistal, buccolingual, and apicocoronal mean deviations at the shoulder and implant apex were equal or below 0.21 ± 0.69 mm, and only the buccolingual mean deviation at the apex reached up to 0.67 ± 1.06 mm. The mesiodistal and apicocoronal deviations were not statistically significant at both the shoulder and apex levels of the implant. The mean total angular deviation was 5.62° ± 4.09. The main limitation of this surgical approach was the requirement for a wide mouth opening. Conclusions: Static fully guided surgery for dental implant placement exhibits minimum deviations respect to presurgical planning. The main limitation in the posterior areas is the requirement for a wide mouth opening. Clinical relevance: Even with minimum deviations clinically acceptable, precautions and safety margins must be respected when using static full-guided surgery to place dental implants.ca
dc.format.extent8ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringer Natureca
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigationsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries26
dc.rights© 2022 Springer Natureca
dc.subject.otherPrecisióca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia assistida per ordinadorca
dc.subject.otherAssistida per ordinadorca
dc.subject.otherImatge tridimensionalca
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherPrecisiónca
dc.subject.otherCirugía asistida por computadoraca
dc.subject.otherCirugía asistida por computadoraca
dc.subject.otherImágenes tridimensionalesca
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentalesca
dc.subject.otherAccuracyca
dc.subject.otherComputer-aided surgeryca
dc.subject.otherComputer-assistedca
dc.subject.otherThree-dimensional imagingca
dc.subject.otherDental implantsca
dc.titleAccuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective studyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint