Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMainas, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Magaz, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorValles, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorMora, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCandiago, Jacopo
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Andres
dc.contributor.authorNart, Jose
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T13:42:25Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T13:42:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMainas, Giuseppe; Ruiz Magaz, Vanessa; Valles, Cristina [et al.]. Keratinized mucosa changes around one-stage implants: A prospective case series. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2021, 24(1), p. 34-42. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cid.13053>. Fecha de acceso: 15 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13053ca
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4537
dc.description.abstractBackground: The need of an adequate band of keratinized tissue (KT) to maintain periodontal health around teeth as well as around implants has been a debated topic over many years but still no conclusions have been drawn. Objectives: This prospective case series evaluates the changes undergone by the keratinized mucosa (KM) and the soft tissue volume around non-submerged implants before the prosthetic rehabilitation. Material and Methods: A total of 40 patients were included. The primary outcome was to analyze the width of the KM at both buccal and lingual aspects compared to the pre-existing KT in the edentulous ridge only in mandibular (pre)molar area. The mucogingival line was marked with a surgical pen and an intra-oral scanner was used to take the impression of the implant area the day of the surgery (T0, baseline) and before the crown placement (T1, 3 months). Buccal soft tissue volume was measured at 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the healing abutment position and a comparison between T0 and T1 was performed. Student t-test was used according to the distribution of the data (Shapiro–Wilk). Results: The mean KT width at baseline was 4.54 ± 1.31 mm at buccal side and 5.04 ± 1.88 mm at lingual side. After 3 months, the mean KM values were 3.15 ± 1.03 mm and 3.72 ± 1.56 mm at the buccal and lingual aspects, respectively. The differences, 30.6% of KM reduction buccally and 26.1% of reduction lingually, were statistically significant for both sides. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this investigation, it was observed that the KM width from the baseline to the 3 months follow up presented a significant dimensional change in both the buccal and lingual aspects, whereas buccal soft tissue volume showed an increase between baseline and follow up.ca
dc.format.extent8ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Researchca
dc.relation.ispartofseries24;1
dc.rights© John Wiley & Sonsca
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherGenivaca
dc.subject.otherProgramarica
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentalesca
dc.subject.otherEncíaca
dc.subject.otherSoftwareca
dc.subject.otherDental implantsca
dc.subject.otherGingivaca
dc.subject.otherSoftwareca
dc.titleKeratinized mucosa changes around one-stage implants: A prospective case seriesca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13053ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint