Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTakamoli, Joan
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Andres
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Amargant, Josep
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Mur, Berta
dc.contributor.authorNart, Jose
dc.contributor.authorValles, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T12:00:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T12:00:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTakamoli, Joan; Pascual, Andres; Martinez-Amargant, Josep [et al.]. Implant failure and associated risk indicators: A retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2021, 32(5), p. 619-628. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13732>. Fecha de acceso: 15 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13732ca
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4535
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate early and late implant loss rates in a sample of patients who had received implant therapy in a university setting as well as patient- and implant-related variables for implant failure. Material and methods: This is a retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients who were treated with implant-supported restorative therapy during the period 2001–2012. Patients were randomly selected from an electronic database and scheduled for an appointment to record subject and implant characteristics. The primary study outcome was implant loss (i.e., early and late implant failure). Results: A total of 190 patients and 710 implants were included. The mean time in function was 8.2 (SD 2.4) years. Four implants (0.6%) failed in four patients (2.1%) prior to connection of the restoration within a mean period of 1.5 (SD 1.3) months after surgical procedure. Moreover, 17 subjects (8.9%) exhibited late implant failure, representing 26 implants (3.7%), after a mean follow-up of 5 years (SD 2.2) from prosthesis connection. The final multivariable model indicated three factors related to late implant failure: subjects <55 years (OR = 3.62; 95% CI 1.46–10.22; p = .002), smokers/former smokers (OR = 6.25; 95% CI 1.70–17.52; p = .005), and implants with no access to interproximal hygiene (OR = 7.25; 95% CI 2.20–28.25; p < .001). Conclusions: The rate for early and late implant failure in a sample of 190 patients who had received implant therapy in a university setting was 2.1% and 8.9%, respectively, at subject level. Subjects <55 years and smokers/former smokers as well as implants with inadequate access to interproximal hygiene were significantly associated with late implant failure.ca
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchca
dc.relation.ispartofseries32;5
dc.rights© John Wiley & Sonsca
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherPròtesis dentals implantadesca
dc.subject.otherFracàs del tractamentca
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentalesca
dc.subject.otherPrótesis dentales sobre implantesca
dc.subject.otherFracaso del tratamientoca
dc.subject.otherDental implantsca
dc.subject.otherImplant-supported dental prosthesisca
dc.subject.otherTreatment failureca
dc.titleImplant failure and associated risk indicators: A retrospective studyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13732ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint