Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHernandez Alfaro, Federico
dc.contributor.authorVivas Castillo, Jocelyn Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rogerio Belle de
dc.contributor.authorHaas Junior, Orion Luiz
dc.contributor.authorGiralt Hernando, Maria
dc.contributor.authorValls-Ontañón, Adaia
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T13:26:28Z
dc.date.available2024-11-21T13:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationHernandez Alfaro, Federico; Vivas Castillo, Jocelyn Sabrina; Oliveira, Rogerio Belle de [et al.]. Barcelona line. A multicentre validation study of a facial projection reference in orthognathic surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery, 2023, 61(1), p. 3-11. Disponible en: <https://www.bjoms.com/article/S0266-4356(22)00281-9/abstract>. Fecha de acceso: 21 nov. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.10.002ca
dc.identifier.issn0266-4356ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4459
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to validate an already published facial anteroposterior reference: upper incisor (UI) to soft tissue plane or so-called Barcelona line (BL) to trace the most aesthetic sagittal position of the maxilla. A cross-sectional multicentre evaluation of Caucasian patients from Spain and Brazil with different anteroposterior maxillary positions was designed. Sagittal images in natural head orientation of grouped patients according to the horizontal distance from the UI to BL were ranked by healthcare professionals and non-professional Caucasian raters according to the aesthetic perception of each profile, using a digital survey. Seventy-four raters (50 laypeople, 12 orthodontists, and 12 maxillofacial surgeons) rated 40 profiles. The best-rated profile corresponded to group 3 (0–4 mm UI-BL) with 61.8% of positive evaluations, followed by group 4 (≥ 4 mm UI-BL): with 61.1%. On the other hand, group 1 (≤−4 mm UI-BL) was the worst-ranked profile with 71.8% of negative evaluations, followed by group 2 (−4–0 mm UI-BL): with 59.6% of negative evaluations. The correlation between the mean assessment score and UI-BL showed a moderately-strong association (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). The inter-rater reliability of assessment (74 evaluators) was moderate (k = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.59). The results suggest that protrusive middle-third facial profiles are preferable. The BL is proposed as a simple, individualised, and reproducible tool to trace an aesthetic sagittal position of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery.ca
dc.format.extent8ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Oral and Maxilofacial Surgeryca
dc.relation.ispartofseries61;1
dc.rights© 2024 Elsevier Inc., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.ca
dc.subject.otherEstèticaca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia ortognàticaca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia maxil·lofacialca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia mínimament invasivaca
dc.subject.otherImatgeca
dc.subject.otherTridimensionalca
dc.subject.otherEstéticaca
dc.subject.otherCirugía ortognáticaca
dc.subject.otherCirugía maxilofacialca
dc.subject.otherCirugía mínimamente invasivaca
dc.subject.otherImagenologíaca
dc.subject.otherTridimensionalca
dc.subject.otherAestheticsca
dc.subject.otherOrthognathic surgeryca
dc.subject.otherMaxillofacial surgeryca
dc.subject.otherMinimally invasive surgeryca
dc.subject.otherImagingca
dc.subject.otherThree-dimensionalca
dc.titleBarcelona line. A multicentre validation study of a facial projection reference in orthognathic surgeryca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.10.002ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint