Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCuadros Fernández, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorSáez Martínez, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorGuinot Jimeno, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorLorente Rodríguez, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorMercade, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T16:01:27Z
dc.date.available2024-11-20T16:01:27Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationCuadros Fernández, Cristina; Sáez Martínez, Sandra; Guinot Jimeno, Francisco [et al.]. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2012, 23(6), p. 400-407. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ipd.12009>. Fecha de acceso: 20 nov. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12009ca
dc.identifier.issn1365-263Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4452
dc.description.abstractBackground: lthough multiple materials have been suggested for pulpotomized primary molars, there is no reliable evidence of the superiority of one particular type. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of formocresol (FC), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), ferric sulphate, and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as pulp dressing agents in primary molars after 2 years. Design: One hundred primary molars requiring pulp treatment were allocated randomly to the control (FC) and experimental groups (MTA, ferric sulphate, and NaOCl). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Statistical analysis using Fischer's exact test was performed to determine the significant differences between groups. Results: In the FC and MTA groups, 100% of the available teeth were clinically successful at all follow-up appointments. In the NaOCl group, one clinical failure was found at 18 months, and two clinical failures in the ferric sulphate group were noted at 12 and 24 months, but no significant differences were found among the groups (P = 0.41). No significant differences in radiographic success were found among all the groups at 24 months of follow-up (P = 0.303). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences among the four materials were found at 24 months suggesting that NaOCl may be an appropriate substitute for FC.ca
dc.format.extent8ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistryca
dc.relation.ispartofseries23;6
dc.rights© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, BSPD and IAPDca
dc.subject.otherPulpotomized primary molarsca
dc.subject.otherDressing materialsca
dc.subject.otherConservative pulp therapyca
dc.subject.otherMolars primaris pulpotomitzatsca
dc.subject.otherMaterials de vestirca
dc.subject.otherTeràpia conservadora de la polpaca
dc.subject.otherMolares primarios pulpotomizadosca
dc.subject.otherMateriales de curadoca
dc.subject.otherTerapia pulpar conservadoraca
dc.titleClinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-upca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12009ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint