Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTabrizi, R.
dc.contributor.authorAboul-Hosn Centenero, Samir Carlos
dc.contributor.authorHazrati, P.
dc.contributor.authorAzadi, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-11T11:05:50Z
dc.date.available2024-11-11T11:05:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationTabrizi, R.; Aboul-Hosn Centenero, Samir; Carlos; Hazrati, P. [et al.]. Comparison of the success rate and marginal bone loss of implants placed simultaneously with either bone expansion or ridge splitting in maxillary sites: a prospective non-randomized study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2024, 53(9), p. 787-794. Disponible en: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502724001413?via%3Dihub>. Fecha de acceso: 11 nov. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.008ca
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4448
dc.description.abstractThis study was performed to compare the amount of marginal bone loss (MBL) and the success rate of implants placed following maxillary ridge expansion with two surgical techniques. A non-randomized prospective study was designed. The patients underwent either bone expansion or ridge splitting, and simultaneous implant placement. The implants were loaded according to the delayed loading protocol with single crowns. Each study group included 35 implants placed in 31 patients. One year after loading, the implant success rate was 100 % in both groups. The median MBL was 1.00 mm in both groups (interquartile range 0.10 mm in the bone expansion group and 0.30 mm in the ridge splitting group) (no significant difference, P = 0.749). The median MBL around implants placed in sites with D2, D3, and D4 density bone was 1.40 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.80 mm in the expansion group and 1.50 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.85 mm in the splitting group, respectively. There was a significant difference in MBL between the different bone density types within both groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, no significant difference in the amount of MBL or the success rate was observed between implants placed simultaneously with ridge splitting and those placed simultaneously with bone expansion, in the maxilla.ca
dc.format.extent7ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryca
dc.relation.ispartofseries53;9
dc.rights© 2024 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.ca
dc.subject.otherPèrdua òssia alveolarca
dc.subject.otherAugment de la cresta alveolarca
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherCirurgia piezoelèctricaca
dc.subject.otherPérdida ósea alveolarca
dc.subject.otherAumento de la cresta alveolarca
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentalesca
dc.subject.otherCirugía piezoeléctricaca
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone lossca
dc.subject.otherAlveolar ridge augmentationca
dc.subject.otherDental implantsca
dc.subject.otherPiezo-electric surgeryca
dc.titleComparison of the success rate and marginal bone loss of implants placed simultaneously with either bone expansion or ridge splitting in maxillary sites: a prospective non-randomized studyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.008ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint