Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonzález Terrats, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorBonnín Liñares, María
dc.contributor.authorPunset fuste, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorMolmeneu, Meritxell
dc.contributor.authorNart Molina, José
dc.contributor.authorRuíz Magaz, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorALBERTINI, MATTEO
dc.contributor.authorManero, José María
dc.contributor.authorGil, FJ
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-23T08:58:00Z
dc.date.available2024-05-23T08:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationGonzález Terrats, Rodrigo; Bonnín Liñares, María; Punset fuste, Miquel [et al.]. Influence of narrow titanium dental implant diameter on fatigue behavior: a comparison between unitary and splinted implants. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024, 13(6), 1632. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/6/1632>. Fecha de acceso: 23 may. 2024. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061632ca
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4246
dc.description.abstractBackground: Scientific literature lacks strong support for using narrow diameter implants (NDI) in high masticatory force areas, especially in molars. Implant splinting in cases of multiple missing teeth reduces lateral forces, improves force distribution, and minimizes stress on implants. However, no studies have evaluated the fatigue load resistance of unitary or splinted implants. Methods: This in vitro study compares five groups of new metal alloy implants, including unitary and splinted implants with varying diameters. Mechanical characterization was assessed using a BIONIX 370 testing machine (MTS, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to ISO 14801. For each of the five study sample groups, (n = 5) specimens underwent monotonic uniaxial compression at break testing and (n = 15) cyclic loading to determine the maximum force (Fmax) and the fatigue life (LF) values. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed for the fractographic analysis of the fractured samples. Results: The Fmax values for unitary samples ranged from 196 N to 246 N, whereas the two-splinted samples displayed significantly higher values, ranging from 2439 N to 3796 N. Similarly, the LF values for unitary samples ranged from 118 N to 230 N, while the two-splinted samples exhibited notably higher values, ranging from 488 N to 759 N. Conclusions: The observed resistance difference between sample groups in terms of Fmax and LF may be due to variations in effective cross-sectional area, determined by implant diameter and number. Additionally, this disparity may indicate a potential stiffening effect resulting from the splinting process. These findings have significant implications for dental clinical practice, suggesting the potential use of splinted sets of small-sized NDI as replacements for posterior dentition (premolars and molars) in cases of alveolar bone ridge deficiencies.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicineca
dc.relation.ispartofseries13;6
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherImplant dental estret (NDI)ca
dc.subject.otherImplants unitarisca
dc.subject.otherImplants de dues fèrulesca
dc.subject.otherISO 14801ca
dc.subject.otherWöhler corbes S/Nca
dc.subject.otherFractografia SEMca
dc.subject.otherCàrrega estàtica i cíclicaca
dc.subject.otherResistència a la fractura estàtica màxima (Fmax)ca
dc.subject.otherLímit de fatiga (LF)ca
dc.subject.otherImplante dental estrecho (NDI)ca
dc.subject.otherImplantes unitariosca
dc.subject.otherImplantes con dos ferulizacionesca
dc.subject.otherISO 14801ca
dc.subject.otherWöhler curvas S/Nca
dc.subject.otherFractografía SEMca
dc.subject.otherCarga estática y cíclicaca
dc.subject.otherResistencia máxima a la fractura estática (Fmax)ca
dc.subject.otherLímite de fatiga (LF)ca
dc.titleInfluence of narrow titanium dental implant diameter on fatigue behavior: a comparison between unitary and splinted implantsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061632ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint