Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalomó-Coll, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorMaté-Sánchez de Val, José E.
dc.contributor.authorRamírez-Fernandez, María P.
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Alfaro, Federico
dc.contributor.authorGargallo-Albiol, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Guirado, José L
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T09:09:16Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T09:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSalomó-Coll, Oscar; Maté-Sánchez de Val, José E.; Ramírez-Fernandez, María P. [et al.]. Topical applications of vitamin D on implant surface for bone-to-implant contact enhance: a pilot study in dogs part II. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2015, 27(7), p. 896-903. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.12707>. Fecha de acceso: 24 ene. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12707ca
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3954
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of vitamin D over implant surface, placed immediately to the extraction, throughout histological and histomorphometric analysis of peri-implant tissue. Material and methods: Six American foxhound dogs were used in the study. Mandibular premolar distal roots were extracted. Twenty-four immediate conical C1 implants (MIS, Barlev, Israel) were randomly assigned to the distal site on each site of the mandible in three groups: (Group CI) 12 titanium implants alone; (Test Group DI) 12 titanium implants supplemented with vitamin D. Prior to implanting, test implants (DI) were submerged in vitamin D 10% solution. No treatment was applied at control implants (CI). After 12 weeks, animals were sacrificed. Block sections were obtained and processed for mineralized ground sectioning. Bone-to-implant contact (Total BIC and BIC%), new bone formation (NBF), interthread bone (ITB), and histological linear measurements (HLM) were analyzed. Results: At 12 weeks, all implants were clinically stable and histologically osseointegrated. BIC evaluation showed Total BIC mean and SD values for DI (48.96 ± 2.14), CI (44.56 ± 1.75) (P < 0.05), BIC% DI (43.59 ± 0.98), and CI (42.67 ± 9.26) (P > 0.05). For interthread bone formation, values were as follows: DI (15.21 ± 3.87), CI (14.79 ± 1.45) (P > 0.05), no statistically differences. Regarding peri-implant new bone formation, no statistically differences could be found between the two groups DI (31.87 ± 1.23), CI (27.18 ± 2.38) (P > 0.05). For linear measurements, test group (DI) showed statistically significant less buccal crestal bone loss (CBL) DI (0.37 ± 0.12)*, CI (1.26 ± 0.8) (P < 0.05), and vitamin D implants showed less lingual junctional epithelium DI (1.58 ± 0.43)*, CI (2.18 ± 0.48) (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in the buccal mucosa. Conclusion: With the limitation of animal studies, topical application of vitamin D on dental implants could reduce crestal bone loss and increase 10% more bone-to-implant contact at 12-week follow-up period.ca
dc.format.extent7ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchca
dc.relation.ispartofseries27;7
dc.rights© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltdca
dc.subject.otherRemodelació òssia
dc.subject.otherImplants dentals
dc.subject.otherContacte amb implants immediats
dc.subject.otherOsteointegració
dc.subject.otherVitamina D
dc.titleTopical applications of vitamin D on implant surface for bone-to-implant contact enhance: a pilot study in dogs part IIca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12707ca


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint