Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
Dynamic implant surgery— an accurate alternative to stereolithographic guides— systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Marques-Guasch, Jordi | |
dc.contributor.author | Bofarull-Ballús, Anna | |
dc.contributor.author | Giralt-Hernando, Maria | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernández-Alfaro, Federico | |
dc.contributor.author | Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-14T16:11:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-14T16:11:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Marques-Guasch, Jordi; Bofarull-Ballús, Anna; Giralt-Hernando, Maria [et al.]. Dynamic implant surgery— an accurate alternative to stereolithographic guides— systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentistry Journal, 2023, 11(6), 150. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/11/6/150>. Fecha de acceso: 14 dic. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/dj11060150 | ca |
dc.identifier.issn | 2304-6767 | ca |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3872 | |
dc.description.abstract | (1) Background: Dynamic guided surgery is a computer-guided freehand technology that allows highly accurate procedures to be carried out in real time through motion-tracking instruments. The aim of this research was to compare the accuracy between dynamic guided surgery (DGS) and alternative implant guidance methods, namely, static guided surgery (SGS) and freehand (FH). (2) Methods: Searches were conducted in the Cochrane and Medline databases to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective case series and to answer the following focused question: “What implant guidance tool is more accurate and secure with regard to implant placement surgery?” The implant deviation coefficient was calculated for four different parameters: coronal and apical horizontal, angular, and vertical deviations. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of 0.05 following application of the eligibility criteria. (3) Results: Twenty-five publications were included in this systematic review. The results show a non-significant weighted mean difference (WMD) between the DGS and the SGS in all of the assessed parameters: coronal (n = 4 WMD = 0.02 mm; p = 0.903), angular (n = 4 WMD = −0.62°; p = 0.085), and apical (n = 3 WMD = 0.08 mm; p = 0.401). In terms of vertical deviation, not enough data were available for a meta-analysis. However, no significant differences were found among the techniques (p = 0.820). The WMD between DGS and FH demonstrated significant differences favoring DGS in three parameters as follows: coronal (n = 3 WMD = −0.66 mm; p =< 0.001), angular (n = 3 WMD = −3.52°; p < 0.001), and apical (n = 2 WMD = −0.73 mm; p =< 0.001). No WMD was observed regarding the vertical deviation analysis, but significant differences were seen among the different techniques (p = 0.038). (4) Conclusions: DGS is a valid alternative treatment achieving similar accuracy to SGS. DGS is also more accurate, secure, and precise than the FH method when transferring the presurgical virtual implant plan to the patient. | en |
dc.format.extent | 20 | ca |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
dc.publisher | MDPI | ca |
dc.relation.ispartof | Dentistry Journal | ca |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 11;6 | |
dc.rights | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject.other | Sistemes de navegació quirúrgica | ca |
dc.subject.other | Cirurgia dinàmica | ca |
dc.subject.other | Cirurgia assistida per ordinador | ca |
dc.subject.other | Cirurgia assistida per ordinador | ca |
dc.subject.other | Implant dental | ca |
dc.subject.other | Precisió | ca |
dc.subject.other | Metaanàlisi | ca |
dc.subject.other | Sistemas de navegación quirúrgica | ca |
dc.subject.other | Cirugía dinámica | es |
dc.subject.other | Cirugía asistida por ordenador | es |
dc.subject.other | Cirugía asistida por computadora | es |
dc.subject.other | Implante dental | es |
dc.subject.other | Exactitud | es |
dc.subject.other | Metanálisis | caes |
dc.subject.other | Surgical navigation systems | en |
dc.subject.other | Dynamic surgery | en |
dc.subject.other | Computer-aided surgery | en |
dc.subject.other | Computer-assisted surgery | en |
dc.subject.other | Dental implant | en |
dc.subject.other | Accuracy | en |
dc.subject.other | Meta-analysis | en |
dc.title | Dynamic implant surgery— an accurate alternative to stereolithographic guides— systematic review and meta-analysis | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca |
dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
dc.subject.udc | 616.3 | ca |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11060150 | ca |
Fitxers en aquest element
Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)
-
Odontologia [245]