Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHidalgo García, César
dc.contributor.authorLorente, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorLópez de Celis, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLucha López, María Orosia
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, Jacobo
dc.contributor.authorMaza Frechín, Mario
dc.contributor.authorTricás Moreno, José Miguel
dc.contributor.authorKrauss, John
dc.contributor.authorPérez Bellmunt, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T12:30:34Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T12:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationHidalgo García, César; Lorente, Ana I.; López de Celis, Carlos [et al.]. Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study. Scientific Reports, 13, 3578. Disponible en: <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30512-3>. Fecha de acceso: 28 mar. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3ca
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3646
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4° (p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however, this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending.en
dc.format.extent10ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringer Natureca
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries13
dc.relation.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30512-3ca
dc.rightsTis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. Te images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherAnatomiaca
dc.subject.otherAtenció sanitàriaca
dc.subject.otherAnatomíaes
dc.subject.otherCuidado de la saludes
dc.subject.otherAnatomyen
dc.subject.otherHealth careen
dc.titleEffects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro studyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Tis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. Te images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint