Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbert, Pérez-Bellmunt
dc.contributor.authorCasasayas-Cos, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorRagazzi, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo García, César
dc.contributor.authorCanet-Vintró, Max
dc.contributor.authorCaballero Martínez, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLópez-de-Celis, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T15:23:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-13T15:23:40Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPérez-Bellmunt, Albert; Casasayas-Cos, Oriol; Ragazzi, Paolo [et al.]. Foam rolling vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching in the hamstring flexibility of amateur athletes: control trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(2), 1439. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1439>. Fecha de acceso: 13 ene. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021439ca
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3532
dc.description.abstractBackground: the use of stretching techniques in the sports world is frequent and common thanks to their many effects. One of the main benefits of stretching is an increased range of motion (ROM). Recently, the use of a foam roller has spread in sports practice due to benefits that are similar to those of shoes observed in stretching. The objective of the following study was to compare the results of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF) with foam rolling (FR). Methods: The design of the study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrial.gov NCT05134883), and the participants were 80 healthy young athletes. The range of motion was evaluated with a modified sit-and-reach test before, during (at 30 s), and at the end of the intervention (at 2 min). The subject’s discomfort sensation was measured using the Borg scale. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d coefficient. Volunteers were randomized into the PNF group or FR group. Results: the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001) during the intervention in favor of PNF group. The differences at the end of intervention showed that the PNF group had a greater increase in flexibility, with this difference being statically significant (p < 0.001). The sensation of perceived exertion with PNF at the end of the intervention was similarly classified as moderate for both groups. Conclusion: Despite the fact that the use of FR is spreading in the field of sports and rehabilitation, the results of the present study suggest that the gain in flexibility in the hamstrings is greater if PNF-type stretches are used instead of FR.en
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthca
dc.relation.ispartofseries20;2
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1439ca
dc.rights© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherExtensibilitatca
dc.subject.otherAdults sansca
dc.subject.otherROMca
dc.subject.otherEstirament muscularca
dc.subject.otherMúsculs isquiotibialsca
dc.subject.otherForçaca
dc.subject.otherFlexibilitatca
dc.subject.otherFàsciaca
dc.subject.otherRodament miofascialca
dc.subject.otherExtensibilidades
dc.subject.otherAdultos sanoses
dc.subject.otherROMes
dc.subject.otherEstiramiento musculares
dc.subject.otherMúsculos isquiotibialeses
dc.subject.otherFortalezaes
dc.subject.otherFlexibilidades
dc.subject.otherFasciaes
dc.subject.otherBalanceo miofasciales
dc.subject.otherExtensibilityen
dc.subject.otherHealthy adultsen
dc.subject.otherROMen
dc.subject.otherMuscle stretchingen
dc.subject.otherHamstring musclesen
dc.subject.otherStrengthen
dc.subject.otherFlexibilityen
dc.subject.otherFasciaen
dc.subject.otherMyofascial rollingen
dc.titleFoam rolling vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching in the hamstring flexibility of amateur athletes: control trialsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021439ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint