Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGodoy-Gallardo, Maria
dc.contributor.authorManzanares Céspedes, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorSevilla Sánchez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorNart, Jose
dc.contributor.authorManzanares, Norberto
dc.contributor.authorManero, José María
dc.contributor.authorGil Mur, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Steven
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rius, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T16:53:04Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T16:53:04Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationGodoy Gallardo, María Manzanares, Maria Cristina Sevilla Sánchez, Pablo [et al.]. Evaluation of bone loss in antibacterial coated dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016, 69, p. 538-545. Disponible en: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928493116306944?via%3Dihub>. Fecha de acceso: 15 nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.020ca
dc.identifier.issn0928-4931ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2947
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effect of antibacterial modified dental implants in the first stages of peri-implantitis. Thirty dental implants were inserted in the mandibular premolar sites of 5 beagle dogs. Sites were randomly assigned to Ti (untreated implants, 10 units), Ti_Ag (silver electrodeposition treatment, 10 units), and Ti_TSP (silanization treatment, 10 units). Coated implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, interferometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Two months after implant insertion, experimental peri-implantitis was initiated by ligature placement. Ligatures were removed 2 months later, and plaque formation was allowed for 2 additional months. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed during the study. Implant-tissue samples were prepared for micro computed tomography, backscattered scanning electron microscopy, histomorphometric and histological analyses and ion release measurements. X-ray, SEM and histology images showed that vertical bone resorption in treated implants was lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). This effect is likely due to the capacity of the treatments to reduce bacteria colonization on the implant surface. Histological analysis suggested an increase of peri-implant bone formation on silanized implants. However, the short post-ligature period was not enough to detect differences in clinical parameters among implant groups. Within the limits of this study, antibacterial surface treatments have a positive effect against bone resorption induced by peri-mplantitis.en
dc.format.extent31ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials science and engineering C. Biomimetic and supramolecular systemsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries69;
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.subject.otherRecobriment antibacteriàca
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherPeriimplantitisca
dc.subject.otherElectrodeposició de plataca
dc.subject.otherRecubrimiento antibacteriases
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentaleses
dc.subject.otherPeriimplantitises
dc.subject.otherElectrodeposición de plataes
dc.subject.otherAntibacterial coatingen
dc.subject.otherDental implantsen
dc.subject.otherPeriimplantitisen
dc.subject.otherSilver electrodepositionen
dc.titleEvaluation of bone loss in antibacterial coated dental implants: an experimental study in dogsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MAT2009-12547
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/MAT2012-30706
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.020ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint