Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPuglisi, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPujol, Angels
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Marco
dc.contributor.authorNart Molina, José
dc.contributor.authorPascual La Rocca, Andres Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T17:01:20Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T17:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.citationPuglisi, Rosario; Santos, Antonio; Pujol, Angels [et al.]. Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2021, [p. 1-34]. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/idh.12520>. Fecha de acceso: 8 jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12520ca
dc.identifier.issn1601-5029ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2609
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare clinical efficacy, chairside time, and post-treatment hypersensitivity of four instruments used for subgingival periodontal debridement. Materials & Methods: Seventeen patients with stage II and III periodontitis were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Quadrants were randomly divided into four treatment groups: Group A: Gracey curettes-Hu-Friedy®; Group B: piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) with No.1S insert; Group C: diamond burs 40µm (Intensiv Perioset®); and Group D: piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with PP1 insert. Clinical outcomes, chairside time, and hypersensitivity were assessed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome variable was improvement in clinical attachment level. Results: At 8 weeks post-treatment, Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were statistically more effective than diamond burs in increasing attachment level and reducing probing pocket depth. Comparison of piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with the other instruments showed a statistical difference (p<0.001) in chairside time. Regarding post-treatment hypersensitivity, no statistical differences were observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were clinically more effective than diamond burs 40 µm. The ultrasonic instruments showed a significant reduction in chairside time.en
dc.format.extent34ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Dental Hygieneca
dc.rights© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.subject.otherTeràpia periodontal no quirúrgicaca
dc.subject.otherDescamacióca
dc.subject.otherDesbridament subgingivalca
dc.subject.otherCuretes periodontalsca
dc.subject.otherUltrasonsca
dc.subject.otherPiezoquirurgiaca
dc.subject.otherTerapia periodontal no quirúrgicaes
dc.subject.otherRaspadoes
dc.subject.otherDesbridamiento subgingivales
dc.subject.otherCuretas periodontaleses
dc.subject.otherUltrasonidoses
dc.subject.otherPiezocirugíaes
dc.subject.otherNon-surgical periodontal therapyen
dc.subject.otherScalingen
dc.subject.otherSubgingival debridementen
dc.subject.otherPeriodontal curettesen
dc.subject.otherUltrasonicen
dc.subject.otherPiezosurgeryen
dc.titleClinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trialen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12520ca


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record