dc.contributor.author | Puglisi, Rosario | |
dc.contributor.author | Santos, Antonio | |
dc.contributor.author | Pujol, Angels | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferrari, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Nart Molina, José | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual La Rocca, Andres Matteo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T17:01:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-08T17:01:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Puglisi, Rosario; Santos, Antonio; Pujol, Angels [et al.]. Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2021, [p. 1-34]. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/idh.12520>. Fecha de acceso: 8 jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12520 | ca |
dc.identifier.issn | 1601-5029 | ca |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2609 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare clinical efficacy, chairside time, and post-treatment hypersensitivity of four instruments used for subgingival periodontal debridement. Materials & Methods: Seventeen patients with stage II and III periodontitis were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Quadrants were randomly divided into four treatment groups: Group A: Gracey curettes-Hu-Friedy®; Group B: piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) with No.1S insert; Group C: diamond burs 40µm (Intensiv Perioset®); and Group D: piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with PP1 insert. Clinical outcomes, chairside time, and hypersensitivity were assessed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome variable was improvement in clinical attachment level. Results: At 8 weeks post-treatment, Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were statistically more effective than diamond burs in increasing attachment level and reducing probing pocket depth. Comparison of piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with the other instruments showed a statistical difference (p<0.001) in chairside time. Regarding post-treatment hypersensitivity, no statistical differences were observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were clinically more effective than diamond burs 40 µm. The ultrasonic instruments showed a significant reduction in chairside time. | en |
dc.format.extent | 34 | ca |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons | ca |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Dental Hygiene | ca |
dc.rights | © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | en |
dc.subject.other | Teràpia periodontal no quirúrgica | ca |
dc.subject.other | Descamació | ca |
dc.subject.other | Desbridament subgingival | ca |
dc.subject.other | Curetes periodontals | ca |
dc.subject.other | Ultrasons | ca |
dc.subject.other | Piezoquirurgia | ca |
dc.subject.other | Terapia periodontal no quirúrgica | es |
dc.subject.other | Raspado | es |
dc.subject.other | Desbridamiento subgingival | es |
dc.subject.other | Curetas periodontales | es |
dc.subject.other | Ultrasonidos | es |
dc.subject.other | Piezocirugía | es |
dc.subject.other | Non-surgical periodontal therapy | en |
dc.subject.other | Scaling | en |
dc.subject.other | Subgingival debridement | en |
dc.subject.other | Periodontal curettes | en |
dc.subject.other | Ultrasonic | en |
dc.subject.other | Piezosurgery | en |
dc.title | Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trial | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | ca |
dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
dc.subject.udc | 616.3 | ca |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12520 | ca |