Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRagucci, Gian Maria
dc.contributor.authorElnayef, Basel
dc.contributor.authorCriado-Cámara, Elena
dc.contributor.authorSuárez López del Amo, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorHernández Alfaro, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T14:20:30Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T14:20:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRagucci, Gian Maria; Elnayef, Basel; Criado-Cámara, Elena [et al.]. Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2020, 6, 40. Disponible en: <https://journalimplantdent.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5>. Fecha de acceso: 3 jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5ca
dc.identifier.issn2198-4034ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2592
dc.description.abstractBackground: Immediate implants are frequently employed in the anterior maxillary area. However, the installation of dental implants simultaneously with tooth extraction can also provide with benefits in the posterior areas with a reduction in time prior the recovery of the masticatory function. Results previously reported in the literature show high-survival and success rates for implants placed in extraction sockets in molar areas; however, this topic has received limited systematic analysis. Material and methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several data-bases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to January 2019 reporting outcomes of immediate implants placed in molar areas. Primary outcomes included survival and success rates, as well as marginal bone loss. Secondary outcomes included the influence of implant position, type of implant connection, grafting protocol, flap or flapless approach, implant diameter, surgical phase, presence of buccal plate, and loading protocol. Results: Twenty studies provided information on the survival rate, with a total sample of 1.106 implants. The weighted mean survival rate of immediate implants after 1 year of follow-up was 96.6%, and the success rate was 93.3%. On the other hand, marginal bone loss was 1.29 ± 0.24 mm. Secondary outcomes demonstrated that grafting the gap and the loading protocol have an effect on survival and success rates. Similarly, the presence or absence of the buccal bone affect crestal bone levels. Meta-analysis of 4 investigations showed a weighted mean difference of 0.31 mm ± 0.8 IC 95% (0.15–0.46) more marginal bone loss at immediate implant placement versus implants in healed sites (p < 0.001) I 2 = 15.2%. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, immediate implant placement in molar extraction socket might be considered a predictable technique as demonstrated by a high survival and success rates, with minimal marginal bone loss.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringer Natureca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Implant Dentistryca
dc.relation.ispartofseries6;
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherDents -- Extraccióca
dc.subject.otherTeixit ossica
dc.subject.otherPèrdua òssiaca
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentaleses
dc.subject.otherDientes -- Extracciónes
dc.subject.otherTejido óseoes
dc.subject.otherPérdida óseaes
dc.subject.otherDental implantsen
dc.subject.otherTeeth -- Extractionen
dc.subject.otherBone tissueen
dc.subject.otherBone lossen
dc.titleImmediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysisca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint