Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArregui Gambús, María
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Florian
dc.contributor.authorGil Mur, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Roman A.
dc.contributor.authorGiner Tarrida, Lluís
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Luis M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T14:50:16Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T14:50:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationArregui, María; Latour, Florian; Gil, Francisco Javier [et al.]. Ion release from dental implants, prosthetic abutments and crowns under physiological and acidic conditions. Coatings, 2021, 11(1), p. 1-12. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/1/98>. Fecha de acceso: 5 feb. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/coatings11010098ca
dc.identifier.issn2079-6412ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1973
dc.description.abstractIon release from dental implants and prosthetic restoration can affect osteointegration and implant viability over a long period of time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to study the ion release from implants and crowns, with and without intermediate anodized abutments, in two different media, simulating clinical conditions. The implants, intermediate prosthetic abutments and Cr–Co crowns were divided into two groups depending on the media: Hanks’ solution and 1% lactic acid, simulating body fluids and microbiologically conditioned fluids, respectively. The study followed the ISO 10271:2011 and 10993-15:2000 standards modified to simulate the replacement of fluids in the oral environment. The ions’ release was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-EOS), and only aluminum, chromium, cobalt, titanium and vanadium were identified. Ion concentration was higher in lactic acid than in Hanks’ solution at all time points (p < 0.05). Only vanadium showed a very low ion release in lactic acid, with no statistically significant differences from the ion release in Hanks’ solution (p = 0.524). Both anodized abutments and the immersion medium influenced the release of ions and affected the corrosion of these structures. The presence of an intermediate anodized abutment also affected ion release, as the level of ions was lower in groups with this component.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofCoatingsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries11;1
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherImplants dentalsca
dc.subject.otherIons
dc.subject.otherOdontologia
dc.subject.otherImplantes dentales
dc.subject.otherIones
dc.subject.otherOdontología
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherIons
dc.subject.otherDentistry
dc.titleIon release from dental implants, prosthetic abutments and crowns under physiological and acidic conditionsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11010098ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/