Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIglesias, María
dc.contributor.authorYebra, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorKudsieh, Bachar
dc.contributor.authorLaiseca, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorNadal, Jeroni
dc.contributor.authorBarraquer, Rafael Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCasaroli-Marano, Ricardo P.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-02T10:28:44Z
dc.date.available2024-02-02T10:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIglesias, María; Yebra, Francisco; Kudsieh, Bachar [et al.]. New applanation tonometer for myopic patients after laser refractive surgery. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 7053. Disponible en: <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64013-4>. Fecha de acceso: 2 feb. 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64013-4ca
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4003
dc.description.abstractThis study assesses the agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and a new experimental applanation tonometer with a convexly shaped apex (CT) after laser myopic refractive surgery. Two different CT radii (CT1 and CT2) were designed with a finite element analyser, and a prospective double masked study on 102 eyes from 102 patients was carried out. A Bland-Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the agreement between GAT measurements and the measurements of both CT1 and CT2 before and after myopic laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 73) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 29). We evaluated a subset of two subgroups (n = 36 each) for intra and inter-observer (IA/IE) error. From the whole cohort, the best IOP agreement was observed between GATpre and CT1post surgery: 16.09 ± 2.92 vs 16.42 ± 2.87 (p < 0.001); ICC = 0.675 (95% CI: 0.554–0.768). In the analysis of LASIK vs PRK, GATpre and CT1post showed the highest agreement, although LASIK measurements were more accurate than PRK, as the ICC = 0.718 (95% CI: 0.594–0.812) and ICC = 0.578 (95% CI: 0.182–0.795) respectively. Excellent agreement was observed for IA/IE, and there was an ICC > 0.8 (95% CI) in all cases. CT1 proved more accurate in the LASIK subgroup. In conclusion, our new version of GAT could be used with post-surgery LASIK patients as a more accurate measurement device compared to the current reference tonometer.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringer Natureca
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries10
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.otherBiofísicaca
dc.subject.otherInvestigació mèdicaca
dc.subject.otherBiofísicaca
dc.subject.otherInvestigación médicaca
dc.subject.otherBiophysicsca
dc.subject.otherMedical researchca
dc.titleNew applanation tonometer for myopic patients after laser refractive surgeryca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc02ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64013-4ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint