Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMoreno Cabezudo, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.authorKinn, Mira
dc.contributor.authorNarberhaus Martínez, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T15:38:07Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T15:38:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMoreno Cabezudo, Jose Antonio; Kinn, Mira; Narberhaus Martínez, Marta. A discussion of think tanks in climate obstruction in response to the “Analysis of the Moreno et al. (2022) publication on EIKE using Peter Gleick’s toolbox”. International Journal of Communication, 2023, 17, 2077-2086. Fecha de acceso: 7 jun. 2023.ca
dc.identifier.issn1932-8036ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3719
dc.description.abstractIn January 2022, we published the paper “A Stronghold of Climate Change Denialism in Germany: Case Study of the Output and Press Representation of the Think Tank EIKE.” Europäisches Institut für Klima und Energie’s (EIKE’s) spokesperson has produced a rejoinder to our study, based on unfounded accusations through a misinterpretation of Gleick’s toolbox on “Deceitful Tactics and Abuse of the Scientific Process.” Here, we respond to those accusations by reviewing new evidence available on EIKE and provide further clarification of our conclusions based on the response received and the latest literature. We conclude that EIKE constitutes a clear example of an organization that masquerades as a think tank but whose work does not conform to the academic standards characteristic of such entities. Holding a key role in the German climate countermovement, its goal is not to promote scientific integrity, but rather to distort climate debates and obstruct climate action.en
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherUniversity of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication & Journalismca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Communicationca
dc.relation.ispartofseries17
dc.rights© 2022 (Jose A. Moreno, Mira Kinn and Marta Narberhaus). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No Derivatives.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.otherObstrucció climàticaca
dc.subject.otherInacció climàticaca
dc.subject.otherNegació climàticaca
dc.subject.otherCanvi climàticca
dc.subject.otherAlemanyaca
dc.subject.otherObstrucción climáticaes
dc.subject.otherInacción climáticaes
dc.subject.otherNegación climáticaes
dc.subject.otherCambio climáticoes
dc.subject.otherAlemaniaes
dc.subject.otherClimate obstructionen
dc.subject.otherClimate inactionen
dc.subject.otherClimate denialen
dc.subject.otherClimate changeen
dc.subject.otherGermanyen
dc.titleA discussion of think tanks in climate obstruction in response to the “Analysis of the Moreno et al. (2022) publication on EIKE using Peter Gleick’s toolbox”en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc502ca


Ficheros en el ítem

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2022 (Jose A. Moreno, Mira Kinn and Marta Narberhaus). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No Derivatives.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir