Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVelasco-Ortega, Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Garcia, Iván
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Guerra, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve Guil, Loreto
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Guzón, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorPérez Antoñanzas, Roman
dc.contributor.authorGil Mur, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T08:49:02Z
dc.date.available2019-09-20T08:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-03
dc.identifier.citationVelasco Ortega, Eugenio; Ortiz García, Ivan; Jiménez Guerra, Álvaro; Monsalve Guil, Loreto; Muñoz Guzón, Fernando; Pérez Antoñanzas, Roman; Gil Mur, Francesc Xavier. «Comparison between sandblasted acid-etched and oxidized titanium dental implants: In vivo study». International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, vol. 20, núm. 13. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/13/3267>. Fecha de acceso: 20 sept. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133267ca
dc.identifier.issn1422-0067ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1235
dc.description.abstractThe surface modifications of titanium dental implants play important roles in the enhancement of osseointegration. The objective of the present study was to test two di erent implant surface treatments on a rabbit model to investigate the osseointegration. The tested surfaces were: a) acid-etched surface with sandblasting treatment (SA) and b) an oxidized implant surface (OS). The roughness was measured by an interferometeric microscope with white light and the residual stress of the surfaces was measured with X-ray residual stress Bragg–Bentano di raction. Six New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vivo study. Implants with the two di erent surfaces (SA and OS) were inserted in the femoral bone. After 12 weeks of implantation, histological and histomorphometric analyses of the blocks containing the implants and the surrounding bone were performed. All the implants were correctly implanted and no signs of infection were observed. SA and OS surfaces were both surrounded by newly formed trabeculae. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) was higher around the SA implants (53.49 8.46) than around the OS implants (50.94 16.42), although there were no significant statistical di erences among them. Both implant surfaces (SA and OS) demonstrated a good bone response with significant amounts of newly formed bone along the implant surface after 12 weeks of implantation. These results confirmed the importance of the topography and physico–chemical properties of dental implants in the osseointegration.ca
dc.format.extent10ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
dc.titleComparison between sandblasted acid-etched and oxidized titanium dental implants: in vivo study
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133267ca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint