Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Angelica
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMoyano, Javier
dc.contributor.authorArtés, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorBotella, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorGil, FJ
dc.contributor.authorPuigdollers, Andreu
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T13:42:08Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T13:42:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationIglesias, Angelica; Flores, Teresa; Moyano, Javier [et al.]. Enamel evaluation after debonding of fixed retention and polishing treatment with three different methods. Materials, 2023, 16(6), 2403. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/6/2403>. Fecha de acceso: 12 abr. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/ma16062403.ca
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3653
dc.description.abstractLack of standardization of the retention phase has led to many studies of stability of movements and characteristic of retainers, disregarding the enamel repercussions of fixed retention on this phase. This study aimed to analyze different methods of enamel polishing after detachment of orthodontic retainers. Forty-five healthy premolars were divided into three groups according to the polishing bur after debonding, and four specimens without intervention were used as control. A 0.038 × 0.015 inches gold chain was bonded between the premolars and then removed. The adhesive remnant was removed with three types of burs according to the study groups (Group 1: white stone at high speed; Group 2: high-speed handpiece with a 30-blade tungsten carbide bur; Group 3: low-speed handpiece and a 30-blade tungsten bur). After debonding and polishing, all samples were analyzed with a confocal microscopy on surface roughness parameters: Sa: Arithmetic mean of the height of the surface. Rq: Square mean of the height of the surface and Sz: Maximum surface height. Mechanical tests were carried out to determine the bonding stress of the retention adhered to the teeth using an electromechanical testing machine. The adhesion stress was 8.23 MPa (±0.87). The quality of the refinement of the enamel after debonding is essential in order to preserve its integrity. The use of the 30-blade tungsten carbide bur provides a smooth enamel surface after polishing.en
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofMaterialsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries16;6
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/6/2403ca
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherDesenganxament dentalca
dc.subject.otherRetencióca
dc.subject.otherPoliment dentalca
dc.subject.otherOrtodònciaca
dc.subject.otherDesprendimiento de dienteses
dc.subject.otherRetenciónes
dc.subject.otherPulido dentales
dc.subject.otherOrtodonciaes
dc.subject.otherTooth detachmenten
dc.subject.otherRetentionen
dc.subject.otherDental polishingen
dc.subject.otherOrthodonticsen
dc.titleEnamel evaluation after debonding of fixed retention and polishing treatment with three different methodsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062403ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint