Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Angelica
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMoyano Lleixà, Javier
dc.contributor.authorArtés Ribas, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorGil Mur, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorPuigdollers, Andreu
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-20T14:33:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-20T14:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIglesias, Angelica; Flores, Teresa; Moyano, Javier [et al.]. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct and indirect bonding with three types of adhesive systems. Materials, 2020, 13(11), p. 1-13. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/11/2644>. Fecha de acceso: 20 jun. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ma13112644ca
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1593
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remaining index (ARI) using one conventional and two novel adhesive systems with clinical step reduction and direct and indirect bonding. A sample of 72 human premolars were divided into six groups of 12 samples. The first three groups (G1, G2, G3) were bonded with a direct technique, while the remaining groups (G4, G5, G6) were bonded by the indirect technique. Groups G1 and G4 used conventional acid-etching primer composite (XT); groups G2 and G5 used self-etching bonding (BO), and groups G3 and G6 had an acid-etching treatment followed by a self-adhesive composite (OC). All groups were exposed to thermocycling. Shear bond strength was analyzed with a universal test machine, and the ARI was examined with 4× magnification. The results showed statistically significant differences between the three adhesive systems. The highest strength values were observed in the XT group G1 (13.54 ± 4 MPa), while the lowest were shown in the BO G2 samples (5.05 ± 2 MPa). There was no significant difference between the direct or indirect bonding techniques on the three compared groups. The type of primer and bonding material significantly influenced the SBS. Values with self-etching bonding were below the minimum recommended for clinical use (5.9–7.8 MPa). There was no difference between indirect and direct bonding techniques. The lowest ARI scores (0–1) were observed in both self-etching and BO groups. Further clinical studies are needed to compare in vivo results.ca
dc.format.extent13ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofMaterialsca
dc.relation.ispartofseries13;11
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).ca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherAdhesiusca
dc.subject.otherOdontologiaca
dc.subject.otherOrtodònciaca
dc.subject.otherAdhesivos
dc.subject.otherOdontología
dc.subject.otherOrtodoncia
dc.subject.otherAdhesives
dc.subject.otherOdontology
dc.subject.otherOrthodontics
dc.titleIn vitro study of shear bond strength in direct and indirect bonding with three types of adhesive systemsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc616.3ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13112644ca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint