Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoyce, Cormac W.
dc.contributor.authorSugrue, Conor
dc.contributor.authorChan, Jeffrey C.
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Garoña, Luis María
dc.contributor.authorZeugolis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Seam M.
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Jack L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-22T10:37:31Z
dc.date.available2019-07-22T10:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-23
dc.identifier.citationJoyce, Cormac W.; Sugrue, Conor; Chan, Jeffrey C.; Delgado Garoña, Luis María; Zeugolis, Dimitrios; Carroll, Seam M.; Kelly, Jack L. «A barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs». Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 2014, vol. 2, núm. 10, art. e237. Disponible en: <https://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/2014/10000/A_Barbed_Suture_Repair_For_Flexor_Tendons___A.4.aspx#pdf-link>. Fecha de acceso: 22 jul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203ca
dc.identifier.issn2169-7574ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1199
dc.description.abstractBackground: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a smaller cross-sectional area at the repair site than traditional methods of repair. Methods: Forty porcine flexor tendons were randomized to polybutester 4-strand barbed repair or to 4-strand Adelaide monofilament repair. The cross-sectional area was measured before and after repair. Biomechanical testing was carried out and 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength of repair, and method of failure were recorded. Results: The mean ultimate strength of the barbed repairs was 54.51 ± 17.9 while that of the Adelaide repairs was 53.17 ± 16.35. The mean 2-mm gap formation force for the barbed group was 44.71 ± 17.86 whereas that of the Adelaide group was 20.25 ± 4.99. The postrepair percentage change in cross-sectional area at the repair site for the Adelaide group and barbed group was 12.0 ± 2.3 and 4.6 ± 2.8, respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated that a 4-strand knotless, barbed method attained comparable strength to that of the traditional Adelaide repair technique. The barbed method had a significantly reduced cross-sectional area at the repair site compared with the Adelaide group. The 2-mm gap formation force was less in the barbed group than the Adelaide group. Barbed repairs show promise for tendon repairs; this simple method warrants further study in an animal model.ca
dc.format.extent6ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsca
dc.relation.ispartofPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Openca
dc.relation.ispartofseries2;10
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherTendonsca
dc.subject.otherTendonesca
dc.subject.otherSutures (Cirurgia)ca
dc.subject.otherSuturasca
dc.subject.otherSuturesca
dc.titleA barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203ca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint